cost of PXL (was Re: pixel's for sale)

[Renato Umali <renato@lfgsm.edu>]

Greetings,



The thing is, people will pay for this depending on how much they want it.  That's pretty 

obvious.  In over 4 years of trying to physically find one of these toys (as opposed to 

"finding" one on the net) in all the places in the Chicagoland area, I've come up empty.  

And believe me, I've looked: church rummage sales, conducted house sales, garage sales, 

second-hand stores, flea markets.  And even though I've filled my "looking for" lists going 

to these places, the PXL-2000 has always eluded me.



What I'm saying is that $449 might not be that bad if you have the money to burn and don't 

mind knowing that a $25 PXL works the same than a $449 one.  Although I bet the person 

with the $25 PXL would say hers works better.



Good lucking making 1. movies, and 2. profits, and 3. finding PXLs from people who don't 

know how much people would pay for them.



- RGU





- 

>Uh, $449 is still about $350 too much for one of these cameras. I'm

>surprised that anyone buys them from you. Sorry to 'dis you publically

>on

>this, but I'm sick of seeing people selling these cameras at such

>ridiculously inflated prices. It's a toy, for crying out loud.

>

>(ducking for cover)

>

>-perry

>

>